Daily Squee

 

« Previous | Next »


His Only Worry is Your Happiness

OMG! What is this? It looks like a Scottish Fold but at 50% power. He’s so sweet.

cute baby animals - His Only Worry is Your Happiness

Squee! Spotter:dunno source via Daily Squee

Incorrect source or offensive?
  • Share on Facebook
  • Copy & paste this:

» 105 Squees

  1. HeyRed! says:

    This particular breed is known as ‘midget’, classified by it’s shortened, stubby wubby legs, and a kitten like personality.

  2. esther says:

    it looks a little bit like a munchkin cat
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Munchkin_(cat)

  3. Gina says:

    OMG a very concerned little Munchkin! SO cute.

  4. Barb says:

    Its a DachsaKitty squuueeeeee!!!!

  5. Cynthia says:

    I’m pretty sure it’s a Munchkin.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Munchkin_%28cat%29

  6. TheColdOne says:

    It’s a munchkin cat and very sad (inbred on purpose to have tiny legs). Though terrible, it’s not AS bad as the “twisty-cats”.

    (I would down-thumb this if available).

    • valw says:

      Not sure what you mean by “twisty cats”, but I agree about this breedline being sad. The cat even looks sad.

      • Anna Rexia says:

        They are cats that are purposefully bred for leg deformities, ie, trashy people breeding cats that should not be bred, for profit and for the freakshow aspect.

      • TheColdOne says:

        Just google “twisty cats” and you’ll see cats walking on their joints. Some insane woman breeds them like that because she thinks they’re adorable.

        • Raph Rockefller Smythe says:

          I would also argue that is is insane to breed any cats and dogs when 7 million are killed each year in shelters in this country alone. One quarter of those killed are “pure bred’.

          I love that you wrote what you did.

        • valw says:

          Hope the same thing happens to her, the witch.

    • robyn says:

      I agree. I think it looks really pathetic.

    • Lola says:

      I’d hardly call this terrible. It appeared in cats just like Dwarfism appeared in humans. There’s no ‘better’ or ‘worse’ just different. Is it cruel and unusual torture that dalmations are inbred to have rounder spots? Last I checked, no one complained.
      But I agree, the twist-cats seem bad. I’d want to do research into whether the cat is in actual pain before I yay or nay’ed my opinion on it though.

      • K Holloway-Rouzroukian says:

        Any resposible breeder would know that this is genetic deformity that, though while shocking, does not pose any different health risks different from any other cat. It is important that, if one does chose to breed Munchkins, to have ONE munchkin parent and another, ‘normal’ breed cat to prevent inbreeding.

        To those who say this is ‘cruel’ and ‘sad’- do some damn research before you go spouting off on your ‘morals’.

        • valw says:

          You are supposed to select the strong genes, not the ones that led to deformity and misery. Do you think that Persian cats whose eyes won’t stop weeping, or pugs that can barely breathe, are OK? Nasty pieces of work like you are responsible for a lot of animal suffering, and I wish it right back on you.

          And don’t DARE preach to the people who have morals, just ‘cos you have none. They are the better ones, not you.

          • roastpotato says:

            Go valw!

          • Sarah says:

            So what about Dachshunds? I don’t hear people complaining that they were inbred to be their stature. Or toy poodles, or any other animal breed that was intentionally bred for their size.

            Peke-faced Persians aren’t even slightly similar to the situation presented by Munchkin cats – the short legs come from a NATURAL gene mutation that DOESN’T hurt the cat. They are completely normal and healthy. Go read a damn book before you open your mouth instead of Googling a bunch of bullshit written by other morons like you on the Internet.

            • Liou says:

              But you are only talking about the individuals that represent the general aspect of the breed. What about the “failures” of the crossings? Those who end up completely deformed during the numerous attempts that lead to the creation of the breed? We never hear about those. However, so many of them need rescuing. Eg white tigers. All humans want is to keep the white fur color, however genes are pretty random, it’s impossible to just pick one, so all those breeds are obtained by trial and error, with a huge percentage of error.
              Maybe those dangerous mutations are also natural, but humans prompt them.

    • Gladys says:

      Exactly. It’s cruel to breed such a malformation.

    • glassroseheart says:

      From what I’ve heard, these cats can do everything that cats with average sized cats can. I haven’t heard of any serious repercussions from this selective breeding. The “twisty-cat” breed sounds like selective breeding for disability however. I bet “twisty cats” get arthritis from walking on their joints. French bulldogs are actually breed with a deformity that puts them at risk too. Because of their smushed-looking face, they have a very high incidence of sleep apnea (stopping breathing in their sleep). Because of the high rate of inbreeding in domesticated animals, many breeds have a tendency to develop mental and physical defects, such as heightened aggression and congenital hip dysplasia. All of these deformities are pretty sad, but all domesticated dog and cat breeds were formed using selective breeding techniques, including inbreeding. At the time when many of the breeds that have problems today were developed, not much was known about the dangers of inbreeding. Of course, this doesn’t excuse the practice when used today. This is why I am a big fan of hybrids. Hybrids becoming popular will help mix up and expand the genetic pool, creating healthier pets in the future.

      • katscratch says:

        Munchkin kitteh is adorable. The person who deliberately breeds ‘twisty’ cats is unspeakable.

        • maglindracia says:

          There was a huge, and i mean HUGE flap in the cat breeding world twenty or so years ago when munchkins were developed. The last thing i heard is that there were no problems as yet with them, they just can’t jump to counter height, which was part of the purpose.

          FYI there was also a huge flap over scottish folds, as some of them developed stiff tails, and the breed was nearly banned. Careful breeding to eliminate the trait seems to have worked to keep them healthy and available for many sqeeees.

          I can’t even imagine the horror of ‘twisty cats’ though. That sounds utterly depraved.

      • Aubrey says:

        Thank you, glassroseheart, for injecting some intelligence into this rant. Good grief.

        • DAZED AND CONFUZED says:

          I got two cats from my mother in law that were born to her cat. The father was a stray with no relation to the mother. The cats looked like twins. Identical in every way except one. As they grew one got taller and the other didn’t. It was like a miniature. In that instance the munchkin could jump just as high if not higher than her sister. There are genetic mutations in every species of animal and they are not always due to inbreeding.

  7. Leslie says:

    Awww…*LOL* He looks like Puss in Boots from Shrek…Especially with those big eyes!

  8. ali says:

    its a munchkin cat..kind of like a miniture horse, they are bred with short legs!

  9. Nienna says:

    Looks like a really expressive Munchkin to me

  10. Kat Bjornstad says:

    It’s a munchkin kitty!

  11. Catherine says:

    Looks like an Exotic Breed. (That’s the name…Honest!)

  12. Jason says:

    People who intentionally breed deformed animals should be locked up. I would give this “squee” a thumbs down too, since I don’t want to encourage this kind of sick behavior.

  13. Alin says:

    Keep that hot pink thong on, Jason. I know from personal experience that those short legs don’t slow down a munchkin at all. They can run and jump just as well as any other cat.

  14. April says:

    Whoever owns that kitty should also have a Corgi. Theme pets!

  15. robyn says:

    Oh, and BTW, you *can* “thumbs down” to a degree by clicking on one star on the top left, for “awful.” I did. :(

  16. CLyons says:

    That looks a bit like Bebeh, the cat in the “I made u a cookie but I eated it” picture :)

  17. roastpotato says:

    I’m with TheColdOne and Jason on this, and will ‘one star’, thanks robyn.
    It should be made illegal to purposely breed such deformities (because they’re cute?) even if they superficially seem to be able to behave normally.
    If there were a ‘innacurate or offensive’ type button to click, i’d be doing that for this poor thing as the less publicity the better.

    • Raph Rockefller Smythe says:

      Yes, thank you and all who condemned this behavior. Click one star-awful.
      Just wait until I rule the universe.

  18. SylverWyrd says:

    Yes, most definitively a Munchkin. Love the sad eyes….makes me want to cuddle him.

  19. lost in the ocean says:

    Umm… I have to disagree with a lot of the comments about how inhumane and sick it is to breed animals like this. For the most part a lot of pure bred animals are inbred to preserve bloodlines and not all munchkins are born due to inbreeding. Just like Dwarfism in humans its a natural occurring genetic abnormality that can result from any birth then if they breed with any other type of cat there is a large chance the genes get passed on. Just my ten cents.

    • 3ddd says:

      Just why do you think someone breeds an animal with a genetic deformity? It’s too make money. Plain and simple. They don’t “preserve the bloodline” for the sake of science or the animal’s welfare. They do it to ensure that their financial future remains intact. Then they relentlessly lobby the various associations to get them to write their standards to reflect the characteristics of the animals they are breeding. This is a very serious multi-billion-dollar business all over the world. Not one breeder of dogs, cats, rabbits, or other animals propagates a tarnished gene pool for the sake of anything except their own bank account.

      • evee says:

        Of course they breed to make money. It’s a business. This cat is essentially a dwarf. Would you tell a dwarf human that they shouldn’t breed because they have a genetic abnormality? Stop complaining. The cats are fine and perfectly healthy, just a bit short.
        It’s not like other breeds which have health problems, which is a whole other issue, so stop comparing the two.
        You act like these cats are an abomination, that’s the worst thing I’ve ever heard.

  20. Melanie says:

    Of course its super cute, but its very wrong to breed deformities into animals just to make them more appealing.

    • Long before dawn says:

      I’m pretty sure that we got corgis, dachshunds, shar peis, bulldogs, and pekingese breeds by breeding animals with deformities/abnormalities.

      • alichronic says:

        guess i’m just a horrible person for owning my purebred dachshunds, since they have the same “deformities” as this cat.

        And I prefer the term “dominant gene-challenged”.

        JK. But you all are crazy, this cat does not suffer at all due to his different size or shape

        • evee says:

          I’m pretty sure anything that’s not a basically a wolf/wild dog is technically bred for a genetic mutation from the original canine group
          same with cats

  21. Laurie says:

    Add me to the voices raised against purposefully breeding deformities just because they meet some “cute” factor. Just sends my blood pressure through the roof.

    • roastpotato says:

      Hi Laurie, where are you?
      I’m in London, UK.

      • valw says:

        Don’t know where Laurie is, but I’m in London, too. Did you go to the Lolcats do at the O2 last year?

        • roastpotato says:

          Hey! i’m in N1, you?
          No, I’m fairly new to these wonderful sites so didn’t know about the O2 event unfortunately. Was it a sporting thing like the ones in USA?

  22. Laurie says:

    Long before dawn, at least in the case of dachshunds and corgis they were bred for specific working purposes. Corgi’s are cattle herders and were bred low and long to be under the kick of the cows and of course the dachshunds name “badger hound” is self-explanitory. Shar peis and bulldogs were bred as fighting dogs, they just have been taken more extreme in form than originally. I don’t agree with the extremes that any brachocephalic dog or cat (pekes, persians, exotics), the extreme elongation of the Siamese or any “modification” that puts the animal at risk of health problems. Even though the munchkin isn’t known for health problems the problems with breeding should tell you that nature is trying to give the breeders a heads up that it doesn’t consider this a viable mutation.

    • roastpotato says:

      + me

    • Anna Rexia says:

      Excellent!!

    • Lola says:

      A lot of your sentencing is making me wonder where you stand on this issue. Are you saying it does or doesn’t cause harm? (Which it does in dogs, but not in cats). Sorry – English major, and your sentence beginning “I don’t agree” made no sense to me, lol. So now I’m wondering on the opinions of all the people who agreed with you. Just trying to get an idea of the popular opine.
      Though incidentally, the only problem with breeding is with two munchkins – munchkins can breed with carriers, traits and non carriers. With other munchkins they just have smaller litters, which really sounds like evolution helping mama kitty keep a handle on her brood – bigger cats and dogs often have larger broods than smaller ones. (Greyhounds can go above 10). Doesn’t mean it’s not viable. It means, rather, that the genes are pre-programmed for better future adaption.

  23. Nienna says:

    So many of you are sure it’s a deformity, how do you know it’s not an adaptation? There are advantages to being short and lower to the ground just as there are advantages to longer legs. The breed is too new to know if there are any significant abnormalities in the genes and it’s not as if humans ‘invented’ these cats. Someone simply found a cat like this and his progeny all acquired the same genetic traits.

    You’re suggesting that new and different are automatically bad.

    • denny says:

      Did anyone actually read the Wiki article linked above? Its a genetic abnormality, not a defect, and munchkin cats do not suffer any health problems as a result of their short legs.

      For the record, I 100% agree that animals should not be bred (or overbred) for DEFORMITIES in order to make a buck – but this one isnt.

      • roastpotato says:

        It is a genetic accident, but then to carry on and make more they have to breed litter mates and then sisters and brothers again and again. So it, like all extreme ‘pedigrees’ was bread to keep the trait that was wanted, ie the abmormality of the short legs.
        The Scottish Fold breed was engineered in this way and is also not supposed to have ay problems, but I’ve heard that they do later in life even from their seemingly innocuous difference.

      • Vuncksa says:

        Did you actually read the article?

        If the kitten receives two dominant Munchkin genes
        then they are not viable.

        I think a 25% lethality rate is pretty horrible.

    • TheColdOne says:

      The munchkins and twisty’s have nothing but disadvantages (the twisty cats need special care). If it’s a new evolutionary tract, then fine, but this is a small mistake that in modern society has been forced to continue because we feel like it. Something like this may have dies out in nature and not continued because it just didn’t work.

  24. rosie says:

    I’ve read in lots of places now that munchkins are perfectly natural – not painful and not inbred and not ‘purpose built’ at all! Im sure kitty is just looking for her fuds :)

  25. rookster says:

    No matter which way you look at it now, this little bugger is still adorable, defect/over-breeding from douche bags or whatever. Munchkins don’t ask to be born that way, they just are. To give something a thumbs down or to not like it because of another mistake is hating someone for being slow or having an injury. Show show this little guy some love, no matter how he was made. :)

    • valw says:

      No reflection on the poor little cat, it’s the breeders we don’t like.

      • TheColdOne says:

        Exactly. It’s not the cat’s fault, we just need to take care of the ones in existence and stop the breeding of new ones. (I could honestly say the same about some dogs)

  26. Catherine says:

    It’s a Munchkin. They’re not accepted by the Cat Fancier’s Association (CFA) because their short legs are caused by a genetic defect.

    • maglindracia says:

      Which is a big deal in CFA rules(no genetic defects), but it does make CFA a whole lot of hypocritical…. they have the most extreme Persians and exotics, with major health issues, not to mention the fact that Manx/cymrics are from a genetic defect (lethal when two tailess mate) and then there are the other kitties, such as Devon and Cornish rex with the curly hair and giant ears (soooo cute!!) just to mention a few. Not sure anymore what breeds CFA is still not accepting, but most unique kittehs are the result of a genetic mutation of some sort. By nature, some genetic mutations are ‘defects’ but that does not necessarily mean that they will affect health.

      I want to go on record as being against propagating mutations that cause an animal any hoarm, pain, or discomfort. Most, however, do not. Munchkins do not. When they were first shown in the cat world, I was disgusted, as i thought the kittehs would have horrible health problems, but in the years since, none have occurred, which makes an immense amount of difference. I quit the ‘cat world’ but I still rescue and love kitties. If they are different but healthy and bred in loving homes, not kitten mills, and if the breeder makes sure all the babies have forever homes, that is pretty much the main issue!

  27. july says:

    squueeee! daschund-kitty hybrid

  28. Jo says:

    Munchkin!!! XD they’re adorable, but the deformities dont help them much… gives em back problems I believe :/

  29. sarah says:

    The Munchkin is a relatively new breed created by a naturally occurring genetic mutation that results in cats with abnormally short legs. However, the shortness of their legs does not seem to interfere with their running and leaping. They are capable of running and climbing as well as a normal sized cat. [1] The gene responsible has been compared to the one that gives Welsh Corgis and Dachshunds their short stature. from wiki, and there are not many so enjoy their cuteness :)

  30. Sare says:

    EEEEEEE!! I LOVE Munchkins! They are teh best!!!

  31. fiffentyne says:

    Omg it’s a SAUSAGE CAT!

  32. Bulletproof Panda says:

    AAAAAAA! Itty-bitty Munchkin squee-tiemz!

  33. FlyingFox says:

    OMFG A CORGIE CAT!!!!! XD

  34. nomnom says:

    SOMEBODY CHOPPED OFF IT’S LEGS!

  35. CATBOYWONDER says:

    THis breed is called a “Munchkin”, not a “midget”, as was stated earlier.

  36. Robin says:

    I would have to name it Lowrider.

  37. Karla Marie says:

    I have to agree that although he is adorable deliberately breeding dwarfism is cruel.

  38. Maya says:

    Munchkin kitteh

  39. Maya says:

    Munchkin kitteh squeee

  40. Random says:

    ZOMG HES SO CUTE WITH HIS LITTLE STUBBY LEGS SQUEEEEEEEE

  41. Aderiana says:

    It’s a munchkin cat. a friend of mine as one and he is perfectly healthy. has no problem getting around and up on things. Takes on the other cat that’s twice his size and weight with no problem.

  42. jessipup says:

    lols I think he’s half corgi ^^

  43. AnnieD says:

    He’s a CorgiCat!!
    I scrolled through the comments and didn’t know ’til know that there is apparently this breed…I also didn’t know that there’s such controversy about the “ethics” of this breed. Maybe all breeding that selects for certain physical characteristics is ultimately not a good thing??

  44. Karl says:

    I don’t like Scottish folds, they always look so depressed. Munckin cats don’t look to good either. Though they are a “newer” breed, they are a mutation indeed. Breeding for this mutation may not be the best idea unless it would be an advantage to all cats. Never forget how evolution works, it’s nog because we understand it, that we fully control it.

  45. PierreMonFils says:

    This is terrible. I know this cat has a cute face, but its proof of the fact that many humans are completely irresponsible and idiotic when it comes to breeding animals. The Munchkin breed is an anatomical abomination. These poor cats have to deal with really terrible physical and internal issues their whole lives.

    Its not an exotic, as i saw up higher somewhere. Exotic Shorthairs are brachycephalic, the cat in the photo has a longer snout.

    I wish that people would stop breeding this cat, and stop thinking they’re ‘soooo cute’. As long as people adore them and want them, they will continue to be bred. The ones that are currently around should have wonderful homes (as all cats deserve), but the people who breed them, in a perfect world, should be incarcerated.

  46. Vampire_Moon says:

    It’s a munchkin, they are being scientifically investigated, but as of yet, it has no problems caused by it’s small stature. it can run, jump etck. just as well as any other breed.

    Teisty cats sound horrible, as an animal rights activist, surely that is a breach or some right or other.

  47. Laolith says:

    For me, any breed that needs human involvement to be sustained is one step too far away from nature. This – and especially the “twisty cat” thing I’m reading about here (no, I’m not Googling it ’cause I know I’ll end up crying and wanting to get a shotgun to dispose of the breeder(s)) just turns my stomach, whatever people might say to try and justify it.
    Just my €0,02.

    • evee says:

      It’s just short and in fact ALL domestic animals require people. They’re domestic. Munchkins can do anything normal cats can, they’re just short.
      Christ… you people are so quick to jump on anything you think is bad without even researching it.

  48. Amanda says:

    I want a munchkin!!

  49. Amanda says:

    Ok, so I googled twisty cats, that is freaking terrible. But munchkins are super cute.

  50. Bleep says:

    tiny kitteh!

  51. Rhonin says:

    Reading through these comments makes my head ache slightly at all the “THIS CAT IS WRONG AND IMMORAL AND IS IN SO MUCH PAIN!!!1″.

    First of all, read the Wikipedia page…there are no documented cases of back/joint problems or diseases that don’t occur in any other standard breed, or with any more frequency.

    Second, my last cat was a munchkin and lived a long happy life for 12 years before my neighbor accidentally ran him over.

    Thirdly, yes, people who do inbreed “pure” munchkins should be beat mercilessly with a crowbar. Due to the fact that it will likely result in a 25% death rate and the various hazards of inbreeding. Even with a mixed litter the short-leggedness is still a 50% chance, that makes no sense even from a profit standpoint.

    Also, as for the “mutations are bad” thing…think about the fact that a large portion of now standard breeds of any domestic animal cropped up from a mutation/abnormality even at the most basic level (smaller/larger than normal, more timid/aggressive, etc.) and humans figuring out that it was useful, or more cute. And no way in hell am I googling “Twisty cat”…

    • Jasper says:

      “Reading through these comments makes my head ache slightly at all the “THIS CAT IS WRONG AND IMMORAL AND IS IN SO MUCH PAIN!!!1″.”

      No one here actually said that. In fact, everyone has been keen to point out that the cats in question are not in pain. I personally am not sure where I stand on the matter, but even still these sort of strawman tactics rub me completely the wrong way.

  52. Brian says:

    I have a munchkin and just want to say that she is a very healthy and happy cat. Purebred munchkins are not possible because two munchkins cannot produce offspring together, therefore inbreeding is not a problem.

    Keep in mind that the many breeds of dog were developed by humans selectively breeding dogs to encourage certain traits. The dachshund, for example, was specifically developed to hunt badgers in their tunnels. Put bluntly, dog breeds do not occur naturally.

  53. felinespirit says:

    I think it’s a munchkin-Scottish fold mix.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Newsletter Sign-up